JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 11, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Corrección de error mecanográfico.

Con el presente proveído se corrige el numeral primero de la parte resolutiva del Auto 320/18, en el sentido de indicar que se declara la nulidad de la Sentencia SU.310/17 y no de la SU.310/07, como equivocadamente se registró.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (8 points)
  1. Primero. CORREGIR el numeral
  2. Primero. del Auto 320 de 2018. En consecuencia donde dice:
  3. DECLARAR LA NULIDAD de la Sentencia SU-310 de 2007, solicitada por la Administradora Colombiana de Pensiones - Colpensiones.
  4. Dicho numeral queda
  5. DECLARAR LA NULIDAD de la Sentencia SU-310 de 2017, solicitada por la Administradora Colombiana de Pensiones - Colpensiones.
  6. Segundo. Ordenar a la Relatoría de esta Corporación, que adjunte copia del presente auto al Auto 320 de 2018, con el fin de que sea publicado junto con éste en la Gaceta de la Corte Constitucional correspondiente.
  7. Tercero. Ordenar a la Secretaría General de la Corte, que envíe copia del presente auto a todas las autoridades a las que se les comunicó el referido Auto 320 de 2018.
  8. Notifíquese, publíquese, comuníquese e insértese en la Gaceta de la Corte Constitucional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Dissenting opinion
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Dissenting opinion
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Dissenting opinion
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Dissenting opinion
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Presidente
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Magistrado
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
04

How it connects

This decision has no citations or indexed topics in the Court's graph yet.